lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241129163803.osh6yrub42hqb5yf@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:08:03 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, kwilczynski@...nel.org,
	bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ssengar@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/pwrctrl: Check the device node exist before device
 removal

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 06:30:21AM -0800, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> There can be scenarios where device node is NULL, in such cases
> of_node_clear_flag accessing the _flags object will cause a NULL
> pointer dereference.
> 
> Add a check for NULL device node to fix this.
> 
> [  226.227601] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000000c0
> [  226.330031] pc : pci_stop_bus_device+0xe4/0x178
> [  226.333117] lr : pci_stop_bus_device+0xd4/0x178
> [  226.389703] Call trace:
> [  226.391463]  pci_stop_bus_device+0xe4/0x178 (P)
> [  226.394579]  pci_stop_bus_device+0xd4/0x178 (L)
> [  226.397691]  pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked+0x2c/0x58
> [  226.401717]  remove_store+0xac/0xc8
> [  226.404359]  dev_attr_store+0x24/0x48
> [  226.406929]  sysfs_kf_write+0x50/0x70
> [  226.409553]  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x144/0x1e0
> [  226.412682]  vfs_write+0x250/0x3c0
> [  226.415003]  ksys_write+0x7c/0x120
> [  226.417827]  __arm64_sys_write+0x28/0x40
> [  226.420828]  invoke_syscall+0x74/0x108
> [  226.423681]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0x100
> [  226.427205]  do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40
> [  226.429748]  el0_svc+0x40/0x148
> [  226.432295]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x114/0x140
> [  226.435528]  el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1c0
> 
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> Cc: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>
> Fixes: 681725afb6b9 ("PCI/pwrctl: Remove pwrctl device without iterating over all children of pwrctl parent")
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>

Thanks for the fix! There was already a patch submitted to fix the same issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241126210443.4052876-1-briannorris@chromium.org/

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/pci/remove.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> index 963b8d2855c1..474ec2453e4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ static void pci_pwrctrl_unregister(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  
> +	if (!dev_of_node(dev))
> +		return;
> +
>  	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(dev_of_node(dev));
>  	if (!pdev)
>  		return;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ