[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dd1caa7-4b95-4e06-a5ac-e2d33ce88d04@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:44:36 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@...hat.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, u-kumar1@...com, vigneshr@...com,
nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dma_request_chan_by_mask() defer probing
unconditionally
On 2024-11-27 8:23 am, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Having no DMA devices registered is not a guarantee that the device
> doesn't exist, it could be that is not registered yet, so return
> EPROBE_DEFER unconditionally so the caller can wait for the required
> DMA device registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@...hat.com>
> ---
> This patch fixes the following error on TI AM69-SK
>
> [ 2.854501] cadence-qspi 47040000.spi: error -ENODEV: No Rx DMA available
>
> The DMA device is probed after cadence-qspi driver, so deferring it
> solves the problem.
Conversely, though, it does carry some risk that if there really is no
DMA device/driver, other callers (e.g. spi-ti-qspi) may now get stuck
deferring forever where the -ENODEV would have let them proceed with a
fallback to non-DMA operation. driver_deferred_probe_check_state() is
typically a good tool for these situations, but I guess it's a bit
tricky in a context where we don't actually have the dependent device to
hand :/
Thanks,
Robin.
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index c1357d7f3dc6ca7899c4d68a039567e73b0f089d..57f07b477a5d9ad8f2656584b8c0d6dffb2ab469 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -889,10 +889,10 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan_by_mask(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask)
> chan = __dma_request_channel(mask, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> if (!chan) {
> mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
> - if (list_empty(&dma_device_list))
> - chan = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> - else
> - chan = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + /* If the required DMA device is not registered yet,
> + * return EPROBE_DEFER
> + */
> + chan = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: 43fb83c17ba2d63dfb798f0be7453ed55ca3f9c2
> change-id: 20241127-defer-dma-request-chan-4f26c62c8691
>
> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists