[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <144c7ba3-786d-4bca-bca7-f02781c82caf@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 08:52:00 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TPM/EFI issue [Was: Linux 6.12]
On 29. 11. 24, 17:03, James Bottomley wrote:
>> But well, fs/fat/ received no significant changes either.
>
> We don't use that at all in the EFI stub (and neither does systemd-
> boot). We use the protocols EFI provides to read fat volumes, so any
> issue would be in the edk2 (or in your case ovmf) FatPkg.
Sure, I had an FS corruption (during initrd write) in my mind.
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists