[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3tbd7iku2uvogozd4nuqrdvsyxcuvjfsqia6d4uk7httcocfxl@hqgsarodnrct>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:09:38 +0100
From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: accel: fxls8962af: add wakeup-source
property
Thanks Krzysztof
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 10:56:06AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:01:24PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > Add the wakeup-source to enable this device as a wakeup source if
> > defined in DT.
>
> That's a circular argument. Especially last part "if ...".
>
> Explain the hardware aspects / reasoning.
Is something like this better?
Add a wakeup-source property to the binding to describe whether the
wakeup interrupts from the accelerometer can wake the system from
suspend.
/Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists