[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc772ca68b843e89ec201db46e3dc94d55faebaf.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:41:54 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@....com>, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@...c.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] sh/irq: use seq_put_decimal_ull_width() for
decimal values
Hi David,
On Sat, 2024-11-09 at 00:26 +0800, David Wang wrote:
> Performance improvement for reading /proc/interrupts on arch sh
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
> ---
> arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> index 4e6835de54cf..9022d8af9d68 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
> {
> int j;
>
> - seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "NMI");
> + seq_printf(p, "%*s:", prec, "NMI");
> for_each_online_cpu(j)
> - seq_printf(p, "%10u ", per_cpu(irq_stat.__nmi_count, j));
> + seq_put_decimal_ull_width(p, " ", per_cpu(irq_stat.__nmi_count, j), 10);
> seq_printf(p, " Non-maskable interrupts\n");
>
> seq_printf(p, "%*s: %10u\n", prec, "ERR", atomic_read(&irq_err_count));
Sorry for the very late reply!
I don't quite understand why seq_put_decimal_ull_width() should be faster than seq_printf().
Can you elaborate on this a bit more?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists