[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lchtswwdxq7uwjfg2e46k2jyzpr43jk5hxvwoode7cc56wuthw@l2feh4c2yu7a>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 18:34:48 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: Switch back to struct platform_driver::remove()
Hello Richard,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:59:33AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 03:53:49PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > After commit 0edb555a65d1 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove()
> > return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for
> > platform drivers.
> >
> > Convert all platform drivers below drivers/ptp to use .remove(), with
> > the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As
> > .remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done
> > by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer.
> >
> > While touching these drivers, make the alignment of the touched
> > initializers consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
>
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
I somehow expected that it's you who will pick up this patch? Does your
ack mean that someone from the netdev people will pick it up (and that I
should have added net-next to the subject prefix and should have waited
until -rc1)?
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists