linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the execveat(AT_EMPTY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ej5vp7iifyy4s2faxsh72dytcfjmpktembvgw6n65sucyf77ze@gmbn2bjvdoau>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:28:07 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@...waw.pl>, Tycho Andersen <tandersen@...flix.com>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, 
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix up /proc/pid/comm in the
 execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) case

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 08:54:38PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Zbigniew mentioned at Linux Plumber's that systemd is interested in
> switching to execveat() for service execution, but can't, because the
> contents of /proc/pid/comm are the file descriptor which was used,
> instead of the path to the binary. This makes the output of tools like
> top and ps useless, especially in a world where most fds are opened
> CLOEXEC so the number is truly meaningless.
> 
> When the filename passed in is empty (e.g. with AT_EMPTY_PATH), use the
> dentry's filename for "comm" instead of using the useless numeral from
> the synthetic fdpath construction. This way the actual exec machinery
> is unchanged, but cosmetically the comm looks reasonable to admins
> investigating things.
> 
> Instead of adding TASK_COMM_LEN more bytes to bprm, use one of the unused
> flag bits to indicate that we need to set "comm" from the dentry.
> 
> Suggested-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@...waw.pl>
> Suggested-by: Tycho Andersen <tandersen@...flix.com>
> Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> Link: https://github.com/uapi-group/kernel-features#set-comm-field-before-exec
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> ---
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Here's what I've put together from the various suggestions. I didn't
> want to needlessly grow bprm, so I just added a flag instead. Otherwise,
> this is very similar to what Linus and Al suggested.
> ---
>  fs/exec.c               | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/binfmts.h |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 5f16500ac325..d897d60ca5c2 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1347,7 +1347,21 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
>  		set_dumpable(current->mm, SUID_DUMP_USER);
>  
>  	perf_event_exec();
> -	__set_task_comm(me, kbasename(bprm->filename), true);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the original filename was empty, alloc_bprm() made up a path
> +	 * that will probably not be useful to admins running ps or similar.
> +	 * Let's fix it up to be something reasonable.
> +	 */
> +	if (bprm->comm_from_dentry) {
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		/* The dentry name won't change while we hold the rcu read lock. */
> +		__set_task_comm(me, smp_load_acquire(&bprm->file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name),
> +				true);

This does not sound legit whatsoever as it would indicate all renames
wait for rcu grace periods to end, which would be prettye weird.

Even commentary above dentry_cmp states:
         * Be careful about RCU walk racing with rename:
         * use 'READ_ONCE' to fetch the name pointer.
         *
         * NOTE! Even if a rename will mean that the length
         * was not loaded atomically, we don't care.

It may be this is considered tolerable, but there should be no
difficulty getting a real name there?

Regardless, the comment looks bogus.