linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Second batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c43676a2-8db6-4ff1-b519-3fd3aa290e4b@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 00:21:38 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Second batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13

On 12/1/24 00:11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 15:18, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This was acked on the mailing list by the RISC-V maintainer, see
>>    https://patchew.org/linux/20240726084931.28924-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/
> 
> Please don't use random links. Maybe patchew will stay around. Maybe
> it won't. This is the first I ever see of it.

I'm not surprised. :)  I'm going to launch into a full comparison of 
lore/patchwork/patchew---but the reason why I used patchew this time, is 
that I wanted to make sure that the one that was acked and included was 
the most recent submission for this series (see for example the top of 
https://patchew.org/linux/20240712083850.4242-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/, 
which was a previous version and has a link to the newest).

> It seems to be maintained by Red Hat, and yes, at least it contains
> the email message ID as part of the URL.
> 
> But when I tried to go to patchew.org and then click on lkml.org, I
> get " https://patchew.org/lkml.org/" and a big "Not found" page.
> 
> And when I clicked on "Linux", I get a working page, I can't even see
> the raw messages without downloading some "patch mbox".
> 
> So "maintained" is perhaps too strong a word.

Fair enough. :) I can certainly stick to lore links if you prefer that.

Paolo