[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241201130356.3bf4c693@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 13:03:56 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, dmurphy@...com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads124s08: Use gpiod_set_value_cansleep()
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:43:08 -0300
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> Using gpiod_set_value() to control the reset GPIO causes some verbose
> warnings during boot when the reset GPIO is controlled by an I2C IO
> expander.
>
> As the caller can sleep, use the gpiod_set_value_cansleep() variant to
> fix the issue.
>
> Tested on a custom i.MX93 board with a ADS124S08 ADC.
>
> Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
> Fixes: e717f8c6dfec ("iio: adc: Add the TI ads124s08 ADC code")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Hmm. Could be considered a feature, but fair enough as the change is
trivial and you are setting it on a real board.
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c
> index 425b48d8986f..f452f57f11c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads124s08.c
> @@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ static int ads124s_reset(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> struct ads124s_private *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> if (priv->reset_gpio) {
> - gpiod_set_value(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 0);
> udelay(200);
> - gpiod_set_value(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset_gpio, 1);
> } else {
> return ads124s_write_cmd(indio_dev, ADS124S08_CMD_RESET);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists