lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241201153818.2633616-6-raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 15:38:13 +0000
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
To: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gourry@...rry.net>,
	<nehagholkar@...a.com>, <abhishekd@...a.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
	<ying.huang@...el.com>, <nphamcs@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<hannes@...xchg.org>, <feng.tang@...el.com>, <kbusch@...a.com>,
	<bharata@....com>, <Hasan.Maruf@....com>, <sj@...nel.org>
CC: <willy@...radead.org>, <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <hughd@...gle.com>,
	<rientjes@...gle.com>, <shy828301@...il.com>, <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, Raghavendra K T
	<raghavendra.kt@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V0 05/10] mm: Add throttling of mm scanning using scan_period

Before this patch, scanning of tasks' mm is done continuously and also
at the same rate.

Improve that by adding a throttling logic:
1) if there were useful pages found during last scan and current scan,
decrease the scan_period (to increase scan rate) by TUNE_PERCENT (15%).

2) if there were no useful pages found in last scan, and there are
candidate migration pages in the current scan decrease the scan_period
aggressively by 2 power SCAN_CHANGE_SCALE (2^3 = 8 now).

Vice versa is done for the reverse case.
Scan period is clamped between MIN (400ms) and MAX (5sec).

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h |   4 ++
 mm/kmmscand.c            | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Future improvements:
1. Consider the slope of useful pages found in last
scan and current scan for finer tuning.
2. Use migration failure information.

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 7361a8f3ab68..620b360b06fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -978,6 +978,10 @@ struct mm_struct {
 
 		/* numa_scan_seq prevents two threads remapping PTEs. */
 		int numa_scan_seq;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KMMSCAND
+		/* Tracks number of pages with PTE A  bit set after scanning. */
+		atomic_long_t nr_accessed;
 #endif
 		/*
 		 * An operation with batched TLB flushing is going on. Anything
diff --git a/mm/kmmscand.c b/mm/kmmscand.c
index 3b4453b053f4..589aed604cd6 100644
--- a/mm/kmmscand.c
+++ b/mm/kmmscand.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include "internal.h"
@@ -27,6 +28,16 @@
 static struct task_struct *kmmscand_thread __read_mostly;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(kmmscand_mutex);
 
+/*
+ * Scan period for each mm.
+ * Min: 400ms default: 2sec Max: 5sec
+ */
+#define KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD_MAX	5000U
+#define KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD_MIN	400U
+#define KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD		2000U
+
+static unsigned int kmmscand_mm_scan_period_ms __read_mostly = KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD;
+
 /* How long to pause between two scan and migration cycle */
 static unsigned int kmmscand_scan_sleep_ms __read_mostly = 16;
 
@@ -58,6 +69,11 @@ static struct kmem_cache *kmmscand_slot_cache __read_mostly;
 
 struct kmmscand_mm_slot {
 	struct mm_slot slot;
+	/* Unit: ms. Determines how aften mm scan should happen. */
+	unsigned int scan_period;
+	unsigned long next_scan;
+	/* Tracks how many useful pages obtained for migration in the last scan */
+	unsigned long scan_delta;
 	long address;
 };
 
@@ -85,6 +101,7 @@ struct kmmscand_migrate_info {
 	struct folio *folio;
 	unsigned long address;
 };
+
 static int kmmscand_has_work(void)
 {
 	return !list_empty(&kmmscand_scan.mm_head);
@@ -324,6 +341,12 @@ static int hot_vma_idle_pte_entry(pte_t *pte,
 			spin_lock(&kmmscand_migrate_lock);
 			list_add_tail(&info->migrate_node, &migrate_list->migrate_head);
 			spin_unlock(&kmmscand_migrate_lock);
+
+			/*
+			 * XXX: Should nr_accessed be per vma for finer control?
+			 * XXX: We are increamenting atomic var under mmap_readlock
+			 */
+			atomic_long_inc(&mm->nr_accessed);
 		}
 	}
 end:
@@ -446,11 +469,85 @@ static void kmmscand_migrate_folio(void)
 	spin_unlock(&kmmscand_migrate_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * This is the normal change percentage when old and new delta remain same.
+ * i.e., either both positive or both zero.
+ */
+#define SCAN_PERIOD_TUNE_PERCENT	15
+
+/* This is to change the scan_period aggressively when deltas are different */
+#define SCAN_PERIOD_CHANGE_SCALE	3
+/*
+ * XXX: Hack to prevent unmigrated pages coming again and again while scanning.
+ * Actual fix needs to identify the type of unmigrated pages OR consider migration
+ * failures in next scan.
+ */
+#define KMMSCAND_IGNORE_SCAN_THR	100
+
+/*
+ * X : Number of useful pages in the last scan.
+ * Y : Number of useful pages found in current scan.
+ * Tuning scan_period:
+ *	Initial scan_period is 2s.
+ *	case 1: (X = 0, Y = 0)
+ *		Increase scan_period by SCAN_PERIOD_TUNE_PERCENT.
+ *	case 2: (X = 0, Y > 0)
+ *		Decrease scan_period by (2 << SCAN_PERIOD_CHANGE_SCALE).
+ *	case 3: (X > 0, Y = 0 )
+ *		Increase scan_period by (2 << SCAN_PERIOD_CHANGE_SCALE).
+ *	case 4: (X > 0, Y > 0)
+ *		Decrease scan_period by SCAN_PERIOD_TUNE_PERCENT.
+ */
+static inline void kmmscand_update_mmslot_info(struct kmmscand_mm_slot *mm_slot, unsigned long total)
+{
+	unsigned int scan_period;
+	unsigned long now;
+	unsigned long old_scan_delta;
+
+	/* XXX: Hack to get rid of continuously failing/unmigrateable pages */
+	if (total < KMMSCAND_IGNORE_SCAN_THR)
+		total = 0;
+
+	scan_period = mm_slot->scan_period;
+
+	old_scan_delta = mm_slot->scan_delta;
+
+	/*
+	 * case 1: old_scan_delta and new delta are similar, (slow) TUNE_PERCENT used.
+	 * case 2: old_scan_delta and new delta are different. (fast) CHANGE_SCALE used.
+	 * TBD:
+	 * 1. Further tune scan_period based on delta between last and current scan delta.
+	 * 2. Optimize calculation
+	 */
+	if (!old_scan_delta && !total) {
+		scan_period = (100 + SCAN_PERIOD_TUNE_PERCENT) * scan_period;
+		scan_period /= 100;
+	} else if (old_scan_delta && total) {
+		scan_period = (100 - SCAN_PERIOD_TUNE_PERCENT) * scan_period;
+		scan_period /= 100;
+	} else if (old_scan_delta && !total) {
+		scan_period = scan_period << SCAN_PERIOD_CHANGE_SCALE;
+	} else {
+		scan_period = scan_period >> SCAN_PERIOD_CHANGE_SCALE;
+	}
+
+	scan_period = clamp(scan_period, KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD_MIN, KMMSCAND_SCAN_PERIOD_MAX);
+
+	now = jiffies;
+	mm_slot->next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(scan_period);
+	mm_slot->scan_period = scan_period;
+	mm_slot->scan_delta = total;
+}
+
 static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 {
 	bool update_mmslot_info = false;
 
+	unsigned int mm_slot_scan_period;
+	unsigned long now;
+	unsigned long mm_slot_next_scan;
 	unsigned long address;
+	unsigned long folio_nr_access_s, folio_nr_access_e, total = 0;
 
 	struct mm_slot *slot;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
@@ -473,6 +570,8 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 		kmmscand_scan.mm_slot = mm_slot;
 	}
 
+	mm_slot_next_scan = mm_slot->next_scan;
+	mm_slot_scan_period = mm_slot->scan_period;
 	mm = slot->mm;
 
 	spin_unlock(&kmmscand_mm_lock);
@@ -483,6 +582,16 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 	if (unlikely(kmmscand_test_exit(mm)))
 		goto outerloop;
 
+	now = jiffies;
+	/*
+	 * Dont scan if :
+	 * This is not a first scan AND
+	 * Reaching here before designated next_scan time.
+	 */
+	if (mm_slot_next_scan && time_before(now, mm_slot_next_scan))
+		goto outerloop;
+
+	folio_nr_access_s = atomic_long_read(&mm->nr_accessed);
 
 	vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, address);
 
@@ -492,6 +601,8 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 
 		address = vma->vm_end;
 	}
+	folio_nr_access_e = atomic_long_read(&mm->nr_accessed);
+	total = folio_nr_access_e - folio_nr_access_s;
 
 	if (!vma)
 		address = 0;
@@ -506,8 +617,12 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 	spin_lock(&kmmscand_mm_lock);
 	VM_BUG_ON(kmmscand_scan.mm_slot != mm_slot);
 
-	if (update_mmslot_info)
+
+	if (update_mmslot_info) {
 		mm_slot->address = address;
+		kmmscand_update_mmslot_info(mm_slot, total);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Release the current mm_slot if this mm is about to die, or
 	 * if we scanned all vmas of this mm.
@@ -532,7 +647,7 @@ static unsigned long kmmscand_scan_mm_slot(void)
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&kmmscand_mm_lock);
-	return 0;
+	return total;
 }
 
 static void kmmscand_do_scan(void)
@@ -595,6 +710,10 @@ void __kmmscand_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
 		return;
 
 	kmmscand_slot->address = 0;
+	kmmscand_slot->scan_period = kmmscand_mm_scan_period_ms;
+	kmmscand_slot->next_scan = 0;
+	kmmscand_slot->scan_delta = 0;
+
 	slot = &kmmscand_slot->slot;
 
 	spin_lock(&kmmscand_mm_lock);
-- 
2.39.3


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ