[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2F18FF7D-5AC9-4EE4-A19A-F016CF5B1971@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 16:22:03 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
CC: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Erin Shepherd <erin.shepherd@....eu>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] exportfs: add flag to allow marking export operations
as only supporting file handles
> On Dec 1, 2024, at 8:28 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-01 at 14:12 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Some filesystems like kernfs and pidfs support file handles as a
>> convenience to enable the use of name_to_handle_at(2) and
>> open_by_handle_at(2) but don't want to and cannot be reliably exported.
>> Add a flag that allows them to mark their export operations accordingly
>> and make NFS check for its presence.
>>
>> @Amir, I'll reorder the patches such that this series comes prior to the
>> pidfs file handle series. Doing it that way will mean that there's never
>> a state where pidfs supports file handles while also being exportable.
>> It's probably not a big deal but it's definitely cleaner. It also means
>> the last patch in this series to mark pidfs as non-exportable can be
>> dropped. Instead pidfs export operations will be marked as
>> non-exportable in the patch that they are added in.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Christian
>>
>> ---
>> Christian Brauner (4):
>> exportfs: add flag to indicate local file handles
>> kernfs: restrict to local file handles
>> ovl: restrict to exportable file handles
>> pidfs: restrict to local file handles
>>
>> fs/kernfs/mount.c | 1 +
>> fs/nfsd/export.c | 8 +++++++-
>> fs/overlayfs/util.c | 7 ++++++-
>> fs/pidfs.c | 1 +
>> include/linux/exportfs.h | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> ---
>> base-commit: 74e20c5946ab3f8ad959ea34f63f21e157d3ebae
>> change-id: 20241201-work-exportfs-cd49bee773c5
>>
>
> I've been following the pidfs filehandle discussion and this is exactly
> what I was thinking we needed: a way to explicitly label certain
> fstypes as unexportable via nfsd.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com <mailto:chuck.lever@...cle.com>>
Though, I wonder if a similar but separate prohibition
mechanism might be necessary for other in-kernel network
file system server implementations (eg, ksmbd).
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists