[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f1bbdf3-22df-415c-b017-de1cf81af57e@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 DONOTMERGE] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other
people
On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> escreveu:
>
>> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100
>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> escreveu:
>>>
>>>>> +Tagging people requires permission
>>>>> +----------------------------------
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:,
>>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named.
>>>>> +For the three aforementioned ones implicit permission is sufficient if the
>>>>> +person contributed to the Linux kernel using that name and email address
>>>>> +according to the lore archives or the commit history -- and in case of
>>>>> +Reported-by: and Suggested-by: did the reporting or suggestion in public.
>>>>> +Note, bugzilla.kernel.org is a public place in this sense, but email addresses
>>>>> +used there are private; so do not expose them in tags, unless the person used
>>>>> +them in earlier contributions.
>>>
>>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions:
>>>
>>> Requested-by:
>>>
>>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1.
>>>
>>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to
>>> be added on a patch series.
> [...]
> You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official"
> tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here.
Ahh, okay, I see the problem now. But well, I'd say "as all except" in a
text like this implicitly only refers to those the text mentions in the
first place. So I'd say it's good as it is. But if people think this is
a problem, I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all
mentioned above except...".
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists