lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0fc9b8c-e86d-46a2-a1d2-5ce8793ad2a5@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:19:50 +0100
From: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
 Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>, airlied@...hat.com,
 kraxel@...hat.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
 tzimmermann@...e.de, daniel@...ll.ch, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/virtio: Add drm_panic support

On 02/12/2024 17:19, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 12/2/24 17:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 11/29/24 15:24, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
>> ....
>>> +static int virtio_drm_get_scanout_buffer(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>> +					 struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct virtio_gpu_object *bo;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!plane->state || !plane->state->fb || !plane->state->visible)
>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> +	bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(plane->state->fb->obj[0]);
>>> +	if (virtio_gpu_is_vram(bo))
>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>
>> VirtIO-GPU now supports importing external dmabufs, we should reject
>> bo->base.base.import_attach here now too.
>>
>>> +
>>> +	/* try to vmap it if possible */
>>> +	if (!bo->base.vaddr) {
>>> +		int ret;
>>> +
>>> +		ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(&bo->base, &sb->map[0]);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			return ret;
>>
>> I've now noticed that drm_gem_shmem_vmap() expects BO reservation lock
>> to be held and we can't take lock it at a panic time.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c#L330
>>
>> This resv warning isn't triggered because bo->base.vaddr is set for VT
>> framebufffer BO when panic happens.

I usually test using gnome desktop in the VM, and in this case vaddr is 
not set, and calling vmap() is needed. (and I don't get the warning, I 
will check why).
>>
>> We actually should reject all BOs that don't have bo->base.vaddr set at
>> the panic time. Please correct it in v6 and rebase on top of a recent
>> drm-next tree.

The lock is there to prevent race conditions between concurrent tasks. 
In the panic handler, no other tasks can run in parallel. Also the 
buffer object is the one currently displayed, so it can't be in the 
middle of a free/resize or move operation. So I think it's safe to call 
vmap() from the panic handler.

> 
> Think ideally we need to have a pre-allocated and pre-mapped BO. Then
> when panic happens, use that BO and tell host to display it, i.e. not to
> reuse currently displayed BO. This will make panic display work in all
> conditions. WDYT?
> 

This means a full framebuffer will be allocated only for the panic use 
case. For GPU with a small amount of VRAM, it's not possible. But 
virtio-gpu is a bit special as it uses system RAM, so it might be less 
problematic to do that.

An alternate solution would be to make sure the framebuffer is vmapped 
(at least if it's shmem) so the panic handler won't need to call vmap().

Best regards,

-- 

Jocelyn



-- 

Jocelyn


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ