[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkV1kSgUpXTfiGOLy2CazzQrJd75=Uwa40CvuE-JRqQfnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:17 -0800
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org, sroettger@...gle.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
mark.rutland@....com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jason@...c4.com,
deller@....de, rdunlap@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de,
peterx@...hat.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, gerg@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
groeck@...omium.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Seal system mappings
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:40 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> +Vlastimil
>
> Jeff... :)
>
> Please review
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
>
> You didn't cc- mantainers of code you are changing. And you reference my
> name without cc'ing me here. I'm sure there's some relevant Taylor Swift
> lyric...
>
I apologize, this shouldn't happen again.
Thanks for reminding me
-Jeff
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 08:20:20PM +0000, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> >
> > Seal vdso, vvar, sigpage, uprobes and vsyscall.
> >
> > Those mappings are readonly or executable only, sealing can protect
> > them from ever changing or unmapped during the life time of the process.
> > For complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see mseal.rst [1].
> >
> > System mappings such as vdso, vvar, and sigpage (for arm) are
> > generated by the kernel during program initialization, and are
> > sealed after creation.
> >
> > Unlike the aforementioned mappings, the uprobe mapping is not
> > established during program startup. However, its lifetime is the same
> > as the process's lifetime [2]. It is sealed from creation.
> >
> > The vdso, vvar, sigpage, and uprobe mappings all invoke the
> > _install_special_mapping() function. As no other mappings utilize this
> > function, it is logical to incorporate sealing logic within
> > _install_special_mapping(). This approach avoids the necessity of
> > modifying code across various architecture-specific implementations.
> >
> > The vsyscall mapping, which has its own initialization function, is
> > sealed in the XONLY case, it seems to be the most common and secure
> > case of using vsyscall.
> >
> > It is important to note that the CHECKPOINT_RESTORE feature (CRIU) may
> > alter the mapping of vdso, vvar, and sigpage during restore
> > operations. Consequently, this feature cannot be universally enabled
> > across all systems.
> >
> > Currently, memory sealing is only functional in a 64-bit kernel
> > configuration.
> >
> > To enable this feature, the architecture needs to be tested to
> > confirm that it doesn't unmap/remap system mappings during the
> > the life time of the process. After the architecture enables
> > ARCH_HAS_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS, a distribution can set
> > CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPING to manage access to the feature.
> > Alternatively, kernel command line (exec.seal_system_mappings)
> > enables this feature also.
> >
> > This feature is tested using ChromeOS and Android on X86_64 and ARM64,
> > therefore ARCH_HAS_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS is set for X86_64 and ARM64.
> > Other architectures can enable this after testing. No specific hardware
> > features from the CPU are needed.
> >
> > This feature's security enhancements will benefit ChromeOS, Android,
> > and other secure-by-default systems.
> >
> > [1] Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABi2SkU9BRUnqf70-nksuMCQ+yyiWjo3fM4XkRkL-NrCZxYAyg@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > History:
> > V4:
> > ARCH_HAS_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS (Lorenzo Stoakes)
> > test info (Lorenzo Stoakes)
> > Update mseal.rst (Liam R. Howlett)
> > Update test_mremap_vdso.c (Liam R. Howlett)
> > Misc. style, comments, doc update (Liam R. Howlett)
> >
> > V3:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241113191602.3541870-1-jeffxu@google.com/
> > Revert uprobe to v1 logic (Oleg Nesterov)
> > use CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS instead of _ALWAYS/_NEVER (Kees Cook)
> > Move kernel cmd line from fs/exec.c to mm/mseal.c and misc. refactor (Liam R. Howlett)
> >
> > V2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014215022.68530-1-jeffxu@google.com/
> > Seal uprobe always (Oleg Nesterov)
> > Update comments and description (Randy Dunlap, Liam R.Howlett, Oleg Nesterov)
> > Rebase to linux_main
> >
> > V1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241004163155.3493183-1-jeffxu@google.com/
> >
> > Jeff Xu (1):
> > exec: seal system mappings
> >
> > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 ++++++
> > Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst | 4 ++
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 8 +++-
> > include/linux/mm.h | 12 ++++++
> > init/Kconfig | 25 ++++++++++++
> > mm/mmap.c | 10 +++++
> > mm/mseal.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
> > security/Kconfig | 24 ++++++++++++
> > 10 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists