lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z04M552eW9LwYVhH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 21:39:19 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, ajarizzo@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iio: pressure: bmp280: Minor cleanup

On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:24:48PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 08:42:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 07:19:04PM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:

...

> > > Changes in v2:
> > > 
> > > Patch 1/3:
> > > 	- Switch if case for better readability
> > > 
> > > Patch 2/3:
> > > 	- Reword commit message
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20241128232450.313862-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > This series adds the SPI interface description on the device-tree file
> > > of the sensor, adds proper self-described sized variables and performs
> > > a minor optimization in time variable names.
> > 
> > For some reason your patches still have v1 in them. I dunno how you prepare
> > your series but I recommend one of the two options:
> > 1) b4 relay
> > 2) my script: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh

> Ah, my mistake! I didn't pay close attention. I use the --reroll-count
> from git format-patch. I was not aware of those automated ways, I will
> definitely use them. Thanks for pointing it out.
> 
> The patches are correct, the versioning is wrong, I can resend them if it
> is necessary. 

Up to Jonathan, if the patches are correct, I don't see the necessity of
resending until there are some issues being noted.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ