lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241202223119.k3uod4ksnlf7gqh2@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 01:31:19 +0300
From: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, james.morse@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
	mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: v6.13-rc1: Internal error: Oops - Undefined instruction:
 0000000002000000 [#1] SMP

Marc,

On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 04:07:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:59:40 +0000,
> Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Marc,
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:53:59PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > What the log doesn't say is what the host is. Is it 6.13-rc1 as well?
> > 
> > No, host is 6.6.60.
> 
> Right. I wouldn't be surprised if:
> 
> - this v6.6 kernel doesn't hide the MPAM feature as it should (and
>   that's proably something we should backport)

How to confirm this? Currently I cannot find any (case-insensitive)
"MPAM" files in /sys, nor mpam string in /proc/cpuinfo, nor MPAM strings
in `strace -v` (as it decodes some KVM ioctls) of qemu process.

> 
> - you get a nastygram in the host log telling you that the guest has
>   executed something it shouldn't (you'll get the encoding of the
>   instruction)

I requested admins of the box for dmesg output since I don't have root
access myself and nowadays dmesg is not accessible for a user.

> 
> Can you confirm these two things?

Also, I tried to reproduce on another Kunpeng box with slightly
different HiSilicon CPU (presenting to the system as Cortex-A72) and the
problem is not reproducible there.

While things are not resolved, is it possible to workaround the problem
with some QEMU option, kernel command line, config option, or a patch?

Thanks,

> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ