[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241202012017.14910-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:20:17 +0900
From: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de,
clrkwllms@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on
PREEMPT_RT.") stopped updating @softirq_context on PREEMPT_RT
to ignore "inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage"
as the report accounts softirq context which PREEMPT_RT doesn't
have to.
However, wait context check still needs to report mutex usage
within softirq, even when its threaded on PREEMPT_RT. The check
is failing to report the usage as task_wait_context() checks if
its in softirq by referencing @softirq_context, ending up not
assigning the correct wait type of LD_WAIT_CONFIG for PREEMPT_RT's
softirq.
[ 0.184549] | wait context tests |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184549] | rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184550] in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185083] in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185606] in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
Account softirq context but only when !PREEMPT_RT so that
task_wait_context() returns LD_WAIT_CONFIG as intended.
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
---
Hi!
I wasn't able come up with a way to fix the wait context test while
keeping the commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting
on PREEMPT_RT.") without referencing @softirq_context...
Hoping to get a feedback on it!
Also I wonder if the test can be skipped as I believe its taken care
by spinlock wait context test since the PREEMPT_RT's softirq context is
protected by local_lock which is mapped to rt_spinlock.
Thanks!
Ryo Takakura
---
include/linux/irqflags.h | 2 +-
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 11 +++++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqflags.h b/include/linux/irqflags.h
index 3f003d5fd..c33c3bbd8 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqflags.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqflags.h
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ do { \
# define lockdep_irq_work_exit(__work) do { } while (0)
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
# define lockdep_softirq_enter() \
do { \
current->softirq_context++; \
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 536bd4715..2a508d6a6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4602,7 +4602,7 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ))
return 0;
- if (curr->softirq_context)
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && curr->softirq_context)
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ))
return 0;
@@ -4610,7 +4610,7 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
if (lockdep_hardirq_context())
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ))
return 0;
- if (curr->softirq_context)
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && curr->softirq_context)
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ))
return 0;
}
@@ -4651,8 +4651,11 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
{
- return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!lockdep_hardirq_context() +
- LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!lockdep_hardirq_context();
+ else
+ return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!lockdep_hardirq_context() +
+ LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
}
static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists