[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173313861474.412.152962477443860855.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:23:34 -0000
From:
tip-bot2 for Thomas Hellström <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Fix ww_mutex dummy lockdep map
selftest warnings
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 0302d2fd6efb0c386e521df0134eb2679a9a138f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0302d2fd6efb0c386e521df0134eb2679a9a138f
Author: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 09:54:30 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 12:16:57 +01:00
locking/ww_mutex: Fix ww_mutex dummy lockdep map selftest warnings
The below commit introduces a dummy lockdep map, but didn't get
the initialization quite right (it should mimic the initialization
of the real ww_mutex lockdep maps). It also introduced a separate
locking api selftest failure. Fix these.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zw19sMtnKdyOVQoh@boqun-archlinux/
Fixes: 823a566221a5 ("locking/ww_mutex: Adjust to lockdep nest_lock requirements")
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241127085430.3045-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
---
include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 4 ++--
lib/locking-selftest.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
index a401a2f..45ff6f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ static inline void ww_acquire_init(struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx,
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
lockdep_init_map(&ctx->dep_map, ww_class->acquire_name,
&ww_class->acquire_key, 0);
- lockdep_init_map(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, ww_class->mutex_name,
- &ww_class->mutex_key, 0);
+ lockdep_init_map_wait(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, ww_class->mutex_name,
+ &ww_class->mutex_key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
mutex_acquire(&ctx->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
mutex_acquire_nest(&ctx->first_lock_dep_map, 0, 0, &ctx->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
#endif
diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c
index 6e0c019..ed99344 100644
--- a/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -1720,8 +1720,6 @@ static void ww_test_normal(void)
{
int ret;
- WWAI(&t);
-
/*
* None of the ww_mutex codepaths should be taken in the 'normal'
* mutex calls. The easiest way to verify this is by using the
@@ -1770,6 +1768,8 @@ static void ww_test_normal(void)
ww_mutex_base_unlock(&o.base);
WARN_ON(o.ctx != (void *)~0UL);
+ WWAI(&t);
+
/* nest_lock */
o.ctx = (void *)~0UL;
ww_mutex_base_lock_nest_lock(&o.base, &t);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists