[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0998223-6141-40e1-be08-d79bfc28eb0a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 21:18:44 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Leo Stone <leocstone@...il.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
syzbot+b01a36acd7007e273a83@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: Add check for deleted inode
On 2024/11/30 2:56, Leo Stone wrote:
> The syzbot reproducer mounts a f2fs image, then tries to unlink an
> existing file. However, the unlinked file already has a link count of 0
> when it is read for the first time in do_read_inode().
>
> Add a check to sanity_check_inode() for i_nlink == 0.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b01a36acd7007e273a83@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b01a36acd7007e273a83
> Fixes: 5d64600d4f33 ("f2fs: avoid bug_on on corrupted inode")
39a53e0ce0df ("f2fs: add superblock and major in-memory structure")?
Due to it missed to do sanity check on i_nlink in initialization version
of f2fs.
Thanks,
Thanks,
> Signed-off-by: Leo Stone <leocstone@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: Correct "Fixes" line
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241124010459.23283-1-leocstone@gmail.com/T/
> ---
> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index 1ed86df343a5..65f1dc32f173 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,12 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *node_page)
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
> + f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx) has a link count of 0",
> + __func__, inode->i_ino);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> return true;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists