[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173314622395.54037.14685523533292835181.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:30:23 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Maslanka <mmaslanka@...gle.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: Intel: avs: da7219: Remove suspend_pre() and
resume_post()
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:52:09 +0000, Marek Maslanka wrote:
> The presence of a plugged jack is not detected after resuming the device
> if the jack was plugged before the device was suspended. This problem is
> caused by calling the
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219-aad.c:da7219_aad_jack_det() function on resume,
> which forces the jack insertion state to be unplugged.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: Intel: avs: da7219: Remove suspend_pre() and resume_post()
commit: 04c319e05d0b08cc789db7abccce0fcb13dbab16
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists