lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e31a698c-09f0-c551-3dfe-646816905e65@gentwo.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:23:53 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, 
    clm@...a.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org, 
    kirill@...temov.name, bfoster@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v6 0/12] Uncached buffered IO

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, Jens Axboe wrote:

>
> So here's a new approach to the same concent, but using the page cache
> as synchronization. That makes RWF_UNCACHED less special, in that it's
> just page cache IO, except it prunes the ranges once IO is completed.


Great idea and someting that is really important these days.

However, one nit that I have is the use of the term "uncached" for a
folio/page. An uncached "page frame" refers to a page frame that requires
accesses not  going through the cpu cache. I.e. device mappings. This is
an established mm/cpu term as far as I can tell.

So maybe be a bit more specific about which cache this is?

PAGE_CACHE_UNCACHED?

or use a different term. It is cached after all but only for a brief
period. So this may be a "TEMPORAL_PAGE" or so? (Similar to the x86
"non-temporal" stores).



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ