lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z0-B6q_CKcQ9gtlE@vamoirid-laptop>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 23:10:50 +0100
From: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, nuno.sa@...log.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, abhashkumarjha123@...il.com,
	jstephan@...libre.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/6] iio: common: ssp_sensors: make use of
 iio_is_soft_ts_enabled()

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 02:17:14PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 01:27:09 +0100
> Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Use the iio_is_soft_ts_enabled() accessor to access the value of the
> > scan_timestamp. This way, it can be marked as __private when there
> > are no direct accessors of it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > index 88b8b56bfa51..c38bf1dfb7bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int ssp_common_process_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, void *buf,
> >  	 */
> >  	memcpy(spd->buffer, buf, len);
> >  
> > -	if (indio_dev->scan_timestamp) {
> > +	if (iio_is_soft_ts_enabled(indio_dev)) {
> 
> It might be simpler to just drop this conditional in favour of always computing the
> value.
> 
> 
> 
> >  		memcpy(&time, &((char *)buf)[len], SSP_TIME_SIZE);
> >  		calculated_time =
> >  			timestamp + (int64_t)le32_to_cpu(time) * 1000000;
> 
> Good to replace this with something more modern like.
> 
> 		calculated_time =
> 			timestamp + get_unaligned_le32(buf + len) * MEGA;
> 
> Jonathan
>

Hi Jonathan,

I could definitely do this, thanks!

Cheers,
Vasilis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ