lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518ee3f1-b871-4349-ba85-3b3fc835a4ca@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:06:26 -0800
From: Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>
To: Amirreza Zarrabi <quic_azarrabi@...cinc.com>,
        Jens Wiklander
	<jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        "Bjorn
 Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski
	<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla
	<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) driver for
 Qualcomm TEE (QTEE)

On 12/2/2024 8:19 PM, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
> This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)
> driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs)
> and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where
> each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke
> these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other
> objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object
> that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services.

The first patch series was RFC and now you had removed the RFC. Can you please
provide the reasons?

https://lwn.net/ml/all/20240702-qcom-tee-object-and-ioctls-v1-0-633c3ddf57ee@quicinc.com/

I understand that you have now changed to tee framework but I want to check
if we should continue with the version and increment here or start from [00]?

-- 
---Trilok Soni

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ