linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] docs: media: profile: make it clearer about maintainership duties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241203102846.6fb3ab52@foz.lan>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:28:46 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] docs: media: profile: make it clearer about
 maintainership duties

Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:48:53 +0000
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> escreveu:

> Hi Mauro,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 10:26:21AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > During the review of the media committes profile, it was noticed  
> 
> s/committe\K/r/

Addressed this and the other editorial changes.

> Can we expect people listed as maintainers to either send PRs or be media
> committers? I think this might be eventually the result but I think we're
> quite far from this currently and I expect things to remain that way in the
> near future.

Yes, having driver maintainers being committers and sending PRs is what we
expect to happen first.

For mid/long-term, once driver maintainers get in board, we may also have
other committers for the drivers whose maintainer is also a committer.

Now, having committers for drivers whose maintainer is not a committer
doesn't sound a good idea, except if such committer is doing just
janitorial work and gets A-B/R-B from the driver maintainer on all
patches he merges.

Thanks,
Mauro