linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: power: supply: add max77759-fg flavor and don't require nvme address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b311b50e0f54959cd8dac1ef21dd798dd6204331.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 10:07:23 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Antoine <t.antoine@...ouvain.be>, Sebastian Reichel
 <sre@...nel.org>,  Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Dimitri Fedrau
 <dima.fedrau@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will
 Deacon <will@...nel.org>,  Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Alim
 Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: power: supply: add max77759-fg flavor
 and don't require nvme address

On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 10:32 +0100, Thomas Antoine wrote:
> On 12/3/24 07:57, André Draszik wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 14:07 +0100, Thomas Antoine via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Antoine <t.antoine@...ouvain.be>
> > > 
> > > As the Maxim max77759 fuel gauge has no non-volatile memory slave address,
> > > make it non-obligatory. Except for this, the max77759 seems to behave the
> > > same as the max1720x.
> > 
> > It also needs an interrupt line, and the previously mentioned shunt-
> > resistor-micro-ohms, and probably a power supply.
> 
> I will try to add the interrupt line for v2. About the power supply, I
> didn't see anything about it in the devicetree from Google. Even it
> there is one, I guess it would be a single power supply for the whole
> max77759, not just the fuel gauge. Wouldn't it be more logical to have an
> mfd which activates the supply when other functions of the max77759 have
> been implemented?

I've looked it up now and for power supply nothing indeed seems necessary.


Cheers,
Andre'