linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Document support for Airoha EN7581 CPUFreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241203105004.fo4huxnbkl2jiu3n@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:20:04 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Document support for Airoha
 EN7581 CPUFreq

On 03-12-24, 11:47, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Ok to summarize
> 
> - cpu node: use perf for PD
> - cpufreq node change node name to power-domain
> - Fix OPP format (already done)
> 
> Did I miss anything? It's strange these case weren't catch by
> dt_binding_check. Sorry, wasn't aware of all these common name.

Please also run "scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict" if you haven't already, I think
I saw some inconsistencies in the second patch.

-- 
viresh