[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmght4ch.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:04:30 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Eliav Farber <farbere@...zon.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, naveen@...nel.org,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com,
farbere@...zon.com, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com,
adityag@...ux.ibm.com, songshuaishuai@...ylab.org, takakura@...inux.co.jp,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: jonnyc@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] kexec: Consolidate
machine_kexec_mask_interrupts() implementation
On Sat, Nov 30 2024 at 20:11, Eliav Farber wrote:
> +
> +config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
> + bool "Clear forwarded VM interrupts during kexec"
This should not be user selectable. Just keep it as:
config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
bool
which defaults to 'n'. Just add a comment what this is about like it's
done with the other options in that file which are only selectable.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists