[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241203013513.2628810-1-jon.lin@rock-chips.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:35:13 +0800
From: Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
heiko@...ech.de,
jon.lin@...k-chips.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: rockchip-sfc: Optimize the judgment mechanism completed by the controller
There is very little data left in fifo, and the controller will
complete the transmission in a short period of time, so
use readl_poll_timeout() for busy wait 10us to accelerate response.
Signed-off-by: Jon Lin <jon.lin@...k-chips.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
index 138508d2c736..14f5b9346050 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
@@ -472,6 +472,16 @@ static int rockchip_sfc_xfer_done(struct rockchip_sfc *sfc, u32 timeout_us)
int ret = 0;
u32 status;
+ /*
+ * There is very little data left in fifo, and the controller will
+ * complete the transmission in a short period of time.
+ */
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(sfc->regbase + SFC_SR, status,
+ !(status & SFC_SR_IS_BUSY),
+ 0, 10);
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+
ret = readl_poll_timeout(sfc->regbase + SFC_SR, status,
!(status & SFC_SR_IS_BUSY),
20, timeout_us);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists