[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y10x3u0x.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:06:38 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>, "Guilherme G . Piccoli"
<gpiccoli@...lia.com>, bluescreen_avenger@...izon.net, Caleb Connolly
<caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] drm/panic: Move drawing functions to drm_draw
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com> wrote:
> Move the color conversions, blit and fill functions to drm_draw.c,
> so that they can be re-used by drm_log.
> drm_draw is internal to the drm subsystem, and shouldn't be used by
> gpu drivers.
I started looking at this in patch 2:
> +#include "../drm_draw.h"
I think we should avoid #includes with ../ like this.
Either drm_draw.h belongs in include/drm, or maybe clients/Makefile
needs to add subdir-ccflags-y += -I$(src)/.. or something like that?
If it's supposed to be internal, I guess the latter, but then the
current convention is to have _internal.h suffix. All drm headers under
drivers/ have that.
Is this the first drm subsystem internal thing that's a separate module?
Should we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS() and MODULE_IMPORT_NS() to enforce it
being internal?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists