[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241202181445.0da50076@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:14:45 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@...onical.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, mst@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: drop netdev_tx_reset_queue() from
virtnet_enable_queue_pair()
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:22:53 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> > Fixes: c8bd1f7f3e61 ("virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v6.11+
> > Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@...onical.com>
>
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
I see Tx skb flush in:
virtnet_freeze() -> remove_vq_common() -> free_unused_bufs() -> virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf()
do we need to reset the BQL state in that case?
Rule of thumb is netdev_tx_reset_queue() should follow any flush
(IOW skb freeing not followed by netdev_tx_completed_queue()).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists