lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5qd74wbiyytgcn3k726jykm37ctahi4yd26vvhqea2rmcv6m6b@v7kcfhu3fyy3>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:04:04 +0100
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, 
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Fix comment for SM6375

On 2024-12-03 13:58:51, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2024-12-03 08:52:59, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > On Mon Dec 2, 2024 at 9:00 PM CET, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > > During an earlier commit, the comment from SM6350 was copied without
> > > > modifying. Adjust the comment to reflect the defines.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> > >
> > > Fixes tag, please.
> > 
> > I thought for just a comment fix it's not necessary / desired.
> 
> Makes one wonder why the SoC name is repeated in a comment in the first place,
> when it is already in every named constant and the containing filename too.
> That's only prone to errors as you've demonstrated here, requiring a separate
> commit and discussion (and automatic backporting via Fixes:) to patch up, while
> it already wasn't relevant/useful for anyone.

Never mind, the filename isn't different, I glanced over too quickly.

In that case the repeat is still somewhat relevant as a separator between all
the SoC-specific defines in this file, even if the #define repeats it as well?

Apologies for the noise.

> 
> Less is more.
> 
> - Marijn
> 
> PS: That's a suggestion to see if we can perhaps remove these from all header
> files instead to save the copy-paste burden in the future?
> 
> > 
> > Anyways:
> > 
> > Fixes: 2d48e6ea3080 ("dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add SM6375 power domains")
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> > > > index df599bf462207267a412eac8e01634189a696a59..d9b7bac309537cbfd2488e7d4fe21d195c919ef5 100644
> > > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
> > > > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
> > > >  #define SM6350_MSS	4
> > > >  #define SM6350_MX	5
> > > >  
> > > > -/* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
> > > > +/* SM6375 Power Domain Indexes */
> > > >  #define SM6375_VDDCX		0
> > > >  #define SM6375_VDDCX_AO	1
> > > >  #define SM6375_VDDCX_VFL	2
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37
> > > > change-id: 20241202-rpmpd-sm6375-06582e126d7f
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > -- 
> > > > Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> > > > 
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ