[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cd10b8b-ff56-4171-ad9c-df84fdad6be2@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 11:07:58 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gautham.shenoy@....com, perry.yuan@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Reuse and refactor code
On 12/4/2024 08:48, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Use static calls to avoid frequent MSR/shared memory system checks.
>
> Reuse existing functions amd_pstate_update_perf() and
> amd_pstate_set_epp() instead of duplicating code.
>
> Remove an unnecessary check for active mode in online and offline
> functions.
>
> Eliminate a redundant function amd_pstate_epp_offline().
>
> Dhananjay Ugwekar (5):
> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Convert the amd_pstate_get/set_epp() to static
> calls
> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move the invocation of amd_pstate_update_perf()
> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Refactor amd_pstate_epp_reenable() and
> amd_pstate_epp_offline()
> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove the cppc_state check in offline/online
> functions
> cpufreq/amd-pstate: Merge amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline() and
> amd_pstate_epp_offline()
>
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
For the patches not already reviewed:
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
I'll add this to superm1/bleeding-edge.
I have another series that I will build on top of it as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists