linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.11 000/817] 6.11.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241204002335.85653-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2024 16:23:35 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net,
	rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	damon@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.11 000/817] 6.11.11-rc1 review

Hello,

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:32:52 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> -----------
> Note, this is will probably be the last 6.11.y kernel to be released.
> Please move to the 6.12.y branch at this time.
> -----------
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.11.11 release.
> There are 817 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Dec 2024 14:36:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>

[1] https://github.com/damonitor/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 57f39ce086c9 ("Linux 6.11.11-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 9 selftests: damon: damos_tried_regions.py
ok 10 selftests: damon: damon_nr_regions.py
ok 11 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 16 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 17 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 18 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 19 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 20 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_hang.py
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh # SKIP
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh # SKIP
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m