lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7ff7afbe-938f-4eb3-b970-331a177c7348@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 21:26:50 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
 "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, "Daniel Mack" <daniel@...que.org>,
 "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 "Haojian Zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
 "Jeremy J. Peper" <jeremy@...emypeper.com>,
 "Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>,
 "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
 "Ralph Siemsen" <ralph.siemsen@...aro.org>,
 "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
 "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
 "Tony Lindgren" <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] ARM: rework ARM11 CPU selection logic

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024, at 15:02, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11:29 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>  - Eukrea CPUIMX35 reference platform
>>  - Freescale/NXP i.MX35 Product Development Kit
>>  - ARM Integrator/CP/IM-LT3 with ARM1136J Core Tile
>
> I can't test that, I doubt anyone can. I think this support can
> be simply deleted unless there is some QEMU support or
> so.
>
>>  - ARM Realview/EB with ARM1136J Core Tile
>
> I will check if I have this one, otherwise this can probably go
> as well.

To clarify, these two do not add any maintenance burden.
Yes, we can probably remove them, but we can also just
keep them around for as long as i.MX35 is supported. Once
we drop i.MX35 it makes sense to leave only the ARM1176
CPUs supported in ARMv6K and reduce the possible feature
set.

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ