[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v7vz3ne4.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 09:42:11 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent
Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman
<jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Maarten
Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David
Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jaroslav
Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Liam Girdwood
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Phong LE
<ple@...libre.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, Seung-Woo Kim
<sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>, Heiko Stübner
<heiko@...ech.de>, Andy
Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>,
Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>, Dave Stevenson
<dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>, Maíra Canal
<mcanal@...lia.com>,
Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance <kernel-list@...pberrypi.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] drm/bridge_connector: hook
drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_update_edid()
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 04:25:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Dec 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > + drm_edid = drm_bridge_edid_read(bridge, connector);
>> > + if (!drm_edid_valid(drm_edid)) {
>>
>> What's the case this check is for?
>>
>> My preference would be that bridge->funcs->edid_read() uses
>> drm_edid_read*() family of functions that do the checks and return the
>> EDID.
>>
>> There are some cases that just allocate a blob and return it. Would be
>> nice if they could be converted, but in the mean time could use
>> drm_edid_valid() right there. Additional validity checks are redundant.
>
> This was c&p from drm_bridge_connector_get_modes_edid(). If you think
> that the check is redundant, could you please send a patch dropping the
> check?
Mmmh. It's just scary to *remove* them, and that's the reason I didn't
want you to add one in the first place! :)
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists