[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e63226d5a0e3e2c942202972c099617aee999c1a.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 20:00:02 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Add an emergency handler in nmi_desc & use
it in nmi_shootdown_cpus()
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 10:07 -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> Another way to fix this problem while allowing panic() calls from
> NMI context is by adding a new emergency NMI handler to the nmi_desc
> structure and provide a new set_emergency_nmi_handler() helper to
> atomically set crash_nmi_callback() in any context. The new emergency
> handler will be invoked first before other handlers in the linked
> list. That will eliminate the need to take any lock and serve the
> panic
> in NMI use case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
I've seen that panic come by a number of times, but
never came up with a good fix.
Your idea certainly looks like it should work, and
avoid all the issues along the way.
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists