[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1147e8d9-b6e1-4290-9cfa-888d93f185e9@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:38:51 +0200
From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
NXP S32 Linux <s32@....com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@...hat.com>, Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@...hat.com>,
Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] can: flexcan: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoC support
On 12/4/2024 10:05 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 04.12.2024 09:49:15, Ciprian Costea wrote:
>> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
>>
>> Add device type data for S32G2/S32G3 SoC.
>>
>> FlexCAN module from S32G2/S32G3 is similar with i.MX SoCs, but interrupt
>> management is different.
>>
>> On S32G2/S32G3 SoC, there are separate interrupts for state change, bus
>> errors, Mailboxes 0-7 and Mailboxes 8-127 respectively.
>> In order to handle this FlexCAN hardware particularity, first reuse the
>> 'FLEXCAN_QUIRK_NR_IRQ_3' quirk provided by mcf5441x's irq handling
>> support. Secondly, use the newly introduced
>> 'FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ' quirk which handles the case where two
>> separate mailbox ranges are controlled by independent hardware interrupt
>> lines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
>> ---
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but I want to extend the "FLEXCAN hardware
> feature flags" table in "flexcan.h". Can you provide the needed
> information?
>
Hello Marc,
I would say the following S32G related information could be added:
>> /* FLEXCAN hardware feature flags
>> *
>> * Below is some version info we got:
>> * SOC Version IP-Version Glitch- [TR]WRN_INT IRQ Err Memory err RTR rece- FD Mode MB
>> * Filter? connected? Passive detection ption in MB Supported?
>> * MCF5441X FlexCAN2 ? no yes no no no no 16
>> * MX25 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 no no no no no no 64
>> * MX28 FlexCAN2 03.00.04.00 yes yes no no no no 64
>> * MX35 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 no no no no no no 64
>> * MX53 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 yes no no no no no 64
>> * MX6s FlexCAN3 10.00.12.00 yes yes no no yes no 64
>> * MX8QM FlexCAN3 03.00.23.00 yes yes no no yes yes 64
>> * MX8MP FlexCAN3 03.00.17.01 yes yes no yes yes yes 64
>> * VF610 FlexCAN3 ? no yes no yes yes? no 64
>> * LS1021A FlexCAN2 03.00.04.00 no yes no no yes no 64
>> * LX2160A FlexCAN3 03.00.23.00 no yes no yes yes yes 64
* S32G2/S32G3 FlexCAN3 03.00.39.00 no yes no
yes yes yes 128
>> *
>> * Some SOCs do not have the RX_WARN & TX_WARN interrupt line connected.
>> */
>
> regards,
> Marc
>
Would you like me to send another version of this patchset with above
information included ?
Best Regards,
Ciprian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists