[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4192766c8f02494a82db68f5732c6dd2@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 11:40:55 +0000
From: "Farber, Eliav" <farbere@...zon.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, "linux@...linux.org.uk"
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "mpe@...erman.id.au"
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, "npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"naveen@...nel.org" <naveen@...nel.org>, "maddy@...ux.ibm.com"
<maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, "paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu"
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "bhe@...hat.com"
<bhe@...hat.com>, "hbathini@...ux.ibm.com" <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
"sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com" <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"adityag@...ux.ibm.com" <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>, "songshuaishuai@...ylab.org"
<songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>, "takakura@...inux.co.jp"
<takakura@...inux.co.jp>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: "Chocron, Jonathan" <jonnyc@...zon.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/2] kexec: Consolidate machine_kexec_mask_interrupts()
implementation
On 12/4/2024 1:02 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> +
>> +config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
>> + bool "Clear forwarded VM interrupts during kexec"
>> + default n
>> + help
>> + When enabled, this option allows the kernel to clear the active state
>> + of interrupts that are forwarded to virtual machines (VMs) during a
>> + machine kexec. For interrupts that are not forwarded, if supported,
>> + the kernel will attempt to trigger an End of Interrupt (EOI).
>
> This caught my attention. It looks like you want to allow people toggling it? I believe only arch code should turn it on as you do by "select", not users.
Thomas Gleixner has also commented about it:
"
This should not be user selectable. Just keep it as:
config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
bool
which defaults to 'n'. Just add a comment what this is about like it's done with the other options in that file which are only selectable.
"
I will fix it in v6.
I'm just waiting for a reply if the new configuration option should be
placed inside or after the following section:
```
menu "IRQ subsystem"
endmenu
```
Thanks, Eliav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists