[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <235ce0a9-1db1-4558-817b-6f92f22be5ab@icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:26:22 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Martin Tuma <martin.tuma@...iteqautomotive.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
Manish Rangankar <mrangankar@...vell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel
<ardb@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/32] driver core: Constify API device_find_child()
and adapt for various existing usages
On 2024/12/3 23:34, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> This also enables an incremental migration.
>> change the API prototype from:
>> device_find_child(..., void *data_0, int (*match)(struct device *dev,
>> void *data));
>>
>> to:
>> device_find_child(..., const void *data_0, int (*match)(struct device
>> *dev, const void *data));
>>
>> For @data_0, void * -> const void * is okay.
>> but for @match, the problem is function pointer type incompatibility.
>>
>> there are two solutions base on discussions.
>>
>> 1) squashing likewise Greg mentioned.
>> Do all of the "prep work" first, and then
>> do the const change at the very end, all at once.
>>
>> 2) as changing platform_driver's remove() prototype.
>> Commit: e70140ba0d2b ("Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform
>> driver struct")
>>
>> introduce extra device_find_child_new() which is constified -> use
>> *_new() replace ALL device_find_child() instances one by one ->
>> remove device_find_child() -> rename *_new() to device_find_child()
>> once.
> Why bother with the last step, which churns the entire code base again?
keep the good API name device_find_child().
> Why not call the new function device_find_child_const() and simply keep
> it (it's descriptive of its function). That way you can have a patch
> series without merging and at the end simply remove the old function.
device_find_child is a good name for the API, 'find' already means const.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists