[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241204125631.au6ggazqdnq5xey2@quack3>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 13:56:31 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jbd2: two straightforward fixes
On Wed 04-12-24 12:00:55, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:44:05 +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> > From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
> >
> > Zhang Yi (2):
> > jbd2: increase IO priority for writing revoke records
> > jbd2: flush filesystem device before updating tail sequence
> >
> > fs/jbd2/commit.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon.
Traditionally, Ted takes jbd2 patches through his tree. For these two
patches, chances for conflicts or unexpected effects are pretty low so I
don't really care but I wanted to point that out :)
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists