[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmgfefak.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 14:41:39 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>,
"Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, "Frederic Weisbecker"
<frederic@...nel.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Alex
Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] rust: hrtimer: implement `TimerPointer` for `Arc`
"Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 4:52 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> No particular reason. It is often easier to rebase things around when
>> they are on their own line.
>>
>> Are there any code guidelines to follow on this?
>
> Not yet -- we have a mixture of styles, though we typically don't go
> to the item-level like in this patch, and instead have done it closer
> to the "Crate" or "Module" styles.
What is the rationale behind this bias? Perhaps we should do a pros/cons
list before settling on a style.
It is arguably easier to merge and rebase when using the `Item` policy.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists