linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241205022305.158202-1-irogers@google.com>
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2024 18:23:05 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, akanksha@...ux.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, 
	atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com, disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, 
	hbathini@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v1] perf test expr: Fix system_tsc_freq for only x86

The refactoring of tool PMU events to have a PMU then adding the expr
literals to the tool PMU made it so that the literal system_tsc_freq
was only supported on x86. Update the test expectations to match -
namely the parsing is x86 specific and only yields a non-zero value on
Intel.

Fixes: 609aa2667f67 ("perf tool_pmu: Switch to standard pmu functions and json descriptions")
Reported-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20241022140156.98854-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
Co-developed-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
index 41ff1affdfcd..726cf8d4da28 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
@@ -75,14 +75,12 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 	double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies, num_packages;
 	int ret;
 	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
-	bool is_intel = false;
 	char strcmp_cpuid_buf[256];
 	struct perf_cpu cpu = {-1};
 	char *cpuid = get_cpuid_allow_env_override(cpu);
 	char *escaped_cpuid1, *escaped_cpuid2;
 
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("get_cpuid", cpuid);
-	is_intel = strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL;
 
 	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("ids_union", test_ids_union(), 0);
 
@@ -245,12 +243,19 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 	if (num_dies) // Some platforms do not have CPU die support, for example s390
 		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >= num_packages);
 
-	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq", expr__parse(&val, ctx, "#system_tsc_freq") == 0);
-	if (is_intel)
-		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq > 0", val > 0);
-	else
-		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq == 0", fpclassify(val) == FP_ZERO);
 
+	if (expr__parse(&val, ctx, "#system_tsc_freq") == 0) {
+		bool is_intel = strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL;
+
+		if (is_intel)
+			TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq > 0", val > 0);
+		else
+			TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq == 0", fpclassify(val) == FP_ZERO);
+	} else {
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq unsupported", 0);
+#endif
+	}
 	/*
 	 * Source count returns the number of events aggregating in a leader
 	 * event including the leader. Check parsing yields an id.
-- 
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog