[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97d7b661-8b9b-4c56-aa85-3833718f4e01@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:24:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>,
Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@...obroma-systems.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher@...rry.de>,
Vahe Grigoryan <vahe.grigoryan@...obroma-systems.com>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@...obroma-systems.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rockchip: increase gmac rx_delay on
rk3399-puma
On 05/12/2024 16:18, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
> During mass manufacturing, we noticed the mmc_rx_crc_error counter,
> as reported by "ethtool -S eth0 | grep mmc_rx_crc_error", to increase
> above zero during nuttcp speedtests. Most of the time, this did not
> affect the achieved speed, but it prompted this investigation.
>
> Cycling through the rx_delay range on six boards (see table below) of
> various ages shows that there is a large good region from 0x12 to 0x35
> where we see zero crc errors on all tested boards.
>
> The old rx_delay value (0x10) seems to have always been on the edge for
> the KSZ9031RNX that is usually placed on Puma.
>
> Choose "rx_delay = 0x23" to put us smack in the middle of the good
> region. This works fine as well with the KSZ9131RNX PHY that was used
> for a small number of boards during the COVID chip shortages.
>
> Board S/N PHY rx_delay good region
> --------- --- --------------------
> Puma TT0069903 KSZ9031RNX 0x11 0x35
> Puma TT0157733 KSZ9031RNX 0x11 0x35
> Puma TT0681551 KSZ9031RNX 0x12 0x37
> Puma TT0681156 KSZ9031RNX 0x10 0x38
> Puma 17496030079 KSZ9031RNX 0x10 0x37 (Puma v1.2 from 2017)
> Puma TT0681720 KSZ9131RNX 0x02 0x39 (alternative PHY used in very few boards)
>
> Intersection of good regions = 0x12 0x35
> Middle of good region = 0x23
>
> Relates-to: PUMA-111
Drop 3rd party tags.
Also you you CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on
mainline kernel or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman.
Regardless of the reason, process needs improvement: please rebase and
always work on mainline or start using mentioned tools tools, so correct
addresses will be used.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists