lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2842aa7b-e369-4c80-b651-a3a9b09d17ff@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:28:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, airlied@...il.com,
 aou@...s.berkeley.edu, conor+dt@...nel.org, drew@...7.com,
 frank.binns@...tec.com, guoren@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
 jszhang@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, matt.coster@...tec.com,
 mripard@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, palmer@...belt.com,
 paul.walmsley@...ive.com, robh@...nel.org, simona@...ll.ch,
 tzimmermann@...e.de, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, wefu@...hat.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/14] dt-bindings: clock: thead,th1520: Add
 support for Video Output subsystem

On 04/12/2024 21:21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> No, that's a clear NAK. You claim you have no address space but in the
>>> same time you have address space via regmap.
>>
>> I see your concern. The VOSYS subsystem's address space includes
>> registers for various components, such as clock gates and reset
>> controls, which are scattered throughout the address space as specified
>> in the manual 4.4.1 [2]. Initially, I attempted to use a shared syscon
>> regmap for access, but I realize this might not be the best approach.
>>
>> To address this, I'll specify the 'reg' property in each node to define
>> the address ranges explicitly fragmenting the address space for the VOSYS
>> manually.
>>
>> vosys_clk: clock-controller@...f528050 {
>>         compatible = "thead,th1520-clk-vo";
>>         reg = <0xff 0xef528050 0x0 0x8>;
>>         #clock-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> pd: power-domain@...f528000 {
>>         compatible = "thead,th1520-pd";
>>         reg = <0xff 0xef528000 0x0 0x8>;
>>         #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> };
> 
> You should have one node:
> 
>     clock-controller@...f528000 {
>       compatible = "thead,th1520-vo";
>       reg = <0xff 0xef528050 0x0 0x1a04>;

Yes, obviously, but probably entire block:

<0xff 0xef528000 0x0 0x1000>;

>       #clock-cells = <1>;
>       #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>     };


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ