[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ebd58fd-8461-476c-9266-a21455d5e819@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:35:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: frank-w@...lic-files.de, Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: add binding for MT7988 SoC
On 04/12/2024 08:41, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Am 4. Dezember 2024 08:35:37 MEZ schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>:
>> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>>>
>>> This adds bindings for MT7988 pinctrl driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>>> ---
>>> changes in v5 (so not adding RB from Rob given in v4):
>>> - do not use MTK_DRIVE_8mA in example
>>> - add _0 functions for pwm
>>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add
>> Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under
>> or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided
>> in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help
>> here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
>> The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version
>> they apply.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>> </form letter>
>
> Is this an automatic message? I guess yes...
>
> I have not added it (robs reviewed-by) from v4 due to changes and explained why in changelog. If i'm wrong please let me know.
Where did you explain the reason of dropping review tag? This has to be
*EXPLICIT* but I only see:
- rebased to 6.13-rc1
- moved dt nodes with mutliple options to BPI-R4 board
- changes suggested by angelo in v4
- changed example in binding and dt node to not using const MTK_DRIVE_8mA
Nothing here suggests even remotely that review tag was dropped. Nothing
suggests that it should be dropped!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists