lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241205083755.1d0e0b3e@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:37:55 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan
 <saravanak@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lizhi Hou
 <lizhi.hou@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Allan Nielsen
 <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, Horatiu Vultur
 <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund
 <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] PCI: of: Create device-tree PCI host bridge node

Hi Bjorn,

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 15:48:52 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 02:15:18PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > PCI devices device-tree nodes can be already created. This was
> > introduced by commit 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for
> > bridge").
> > 
> > In order to have device-tree nodes related to PCI devices attached on
> > their PCI root bus (the PCI bus handled by the PCI host bridge), a PCI
> > root bus device-tree node is needed. This root bus node will be used as
> > the parent node of the first level devices scanned on the bus. On
> > device-tree based systems, this PCI root bus device tree node is set to
> > the node of the related PCI host bridge. The PCI host bridge node is
> > available in the device-tree used to describe the hardware passed at
> > boot.
> > 
> > On non device-tree based system (such as ACPI), a device-tree node for
> > the PCI host bridge or for the root bus do not exist. Indeed, the PCI
> > host bridge is not described in a device-tree used at boot simply
> > because no device-tree are passed at boot.  
> 
> s/do not exist/does not exist/

Will be fix in the next iteration.

> 
> > +void of_pci_make_host_bridge_node(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > +	struct of_changeset *cset;
> > +	const char *name;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there is already a device-tree node linked to the PCI bus handled
> > +	 * by this bridge (i.e. the PCI root bus), nothing to do.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (pci_bus_to_OF_node(bridge->bus))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/* The root bus has no node. Check that the host bridge has no node too */
> > +	if (bridge->dev.of_node) {
> > +		pr_err("PCI host bridge of_node already set");  
> 
> Can we use dev_err() here?

Yes indeed.
Will be change in the next iteration.

Best regards,
Hervé

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ