[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16b70aac-fc5d-4aed-934d-19cb5ead1b8f@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 07:49:35 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>, "axboe@...nel.dk"
<axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix the wrong format specifier
On 12/4/24 06:45, liujing wrote:
> Make a minor change to eliminate a static checker warning. The type
> of 'size' is unsigned int, so the correct format specifier should be
> %u instead of %d.
>
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@...s.chinamobile.com>
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index ac4d77c88932..3a75de450799 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static struct bio_slab *create_bio_slab(unsigned int size)
> if (!bslab)
> return NULL;
>
> - snprintf(bslab->name, sizeof(bslab->name), "bio-%d", size);
> + snprintf(bslab->name, sizeof(bslab->name), "bio-%u", size);
> bslab->slab = kmem_cache_create(bslab->name, size,
> ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN,
> SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
Indeed, looks good, but patch format looks little bit different ...
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
-ck
static struct bio_slab *create_bio_slab(unsigned int size)
{
struct bio_slab *bslab = kzalloc(sizeof(*bslab), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bslab)
return NULL;
snprintf(bslab->name, sizeof(bslab->name), "bio-%d", size);
bslab->slab = kmem_cache_create(bslab->name, size,
ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN,
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
if (!bslab->slab)
goto fail_alloc_slab;
bslab->slab_ref = 1;
bslab->slab_size = size;
if (!xa_err(xa_store(&bio_slabs, size, bslab, GFP_KERNEL)))
return bslab;
kmem_cache_destroy(bslab->slab);
fail_alloc_slab:
kfree(bslab);
return NULL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists