[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90ec4241-c8d2-452a-a7c3-e983e5df1872@emfend.at>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:52:55 +0100
From: Matthias Fend <matthias.fend@...end.at>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dt-bindings: sony,imx415: add required clock-names
property
Hi Krzysztof,
Am 02.12.2024 um 08:56 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 03:17:15PM +0100, Matthias Fend wrote:
>> The imx415 driver expects a clock with the name "inck".
>> Document this in the bindings.
>
> No, fix the driver instead of bypassing review. It was decided to drop
> it during review, so you cannot reintroduce it 2 years later claiming
> that's now ABI. Of course original submission was buggy and never
> tested, but that does not allow review bypass.
Sorry. I discovered this by accident when I was using a copy of the DT
snippet and realized it doesn't work that way.
I wasn't aware that this was intentionally removed (at least partially)
during the review discussion...
Best regards
~Matthias
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists