[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6999aff2-5889-4786-9395-28d9ce40f6c0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 13:12:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...ize.com>,
Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, James Cowgill
<james.cowgill@...ize.com>, Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, soc@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] MAINTAINER: Add entry for Blaize SoC
On 05/12/2024 12:22, Matt Redfearn wrote:
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> They should also ack it to confirm they understand the burden.
>
> Acked-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...ize.com>
>
>
> A question about process: should Niko resend V5 with all of the acks?
Normally not, here however after finished review expectation was to send
it to soc tree (I think Arnd described the process).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists