[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241206161210.163701-14-yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:12:06 +0000
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: <yazen.ghannam@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>, Tony Luck
<tony.luck@...el.com>, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, "Bjorn
Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, "Guenter
Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>, "Shyam
Sundar S K" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, "Naveen
Krishna Chatradhi" <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>, Suma Hegde
<suma.hegde@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/16] x86/amd_node: Use defines for SMN register offsets
There are more than one SMN index/data pair available for software use.
The register offsets are different, but the protocol is the same.
Use defines for the SMN offset values and allow the index/data offsets
to be passed to the read/write helper function.
This eases code reuse with other SMN users in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
---
Notes:
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/20241023172150.659002-14-yazen.ghannam@amd.com
v1->v2:
* No change.
arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
index 45077e2e6f2f..d2ec7fd555c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_node.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static struct pci_dev **amd_roots;
/* Protect the PCI config register pairs used for SMN. */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(smn_mutex);
+#define SMN_INDEX_OFFSET 0x60
+#define SMN_DATA_OFFSET 0x64
+
/*
* SMN accesses may fail in ways that are difficult to detect here in the called
* functions amd_smn_read() and amd_smn_write(). Therefore, callers must do
@@ -131,7 +134,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(smn_mutex);
* the operation is considered a success, and the caller does their own
* checking.
*/
-static int __amd_smn_rw(u16 node, u32 address, u32 *value, bool write)
+static int __amd_smn_rw(u8 i_off, u8 d_off, u16 node, u32 address, u32 *value, bool write)
{
struct pci_dev *root;
int err = -ENODEV;
@@ -145,21 +148,21 @@ static int __amd_smn_rw(u16 node, u32 address, u32 *value, bool write)
guard(mutex)(&smn_mutex);
- err = pci_write_config_dword(root, 0x60, address);
+ err = pci_write_config_dword(root, i_off, address);
if (err) {
pr_warn("Error programming SMN address 0x%x.\n", address);
return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
}
- err = (write ? pci_write_config_dword(root, 0x64, *value)
- : pci_read_config_dword(root, 0x64, value));
+ err = (write ? pci_write_config_dword(root, d_off, *value)
+ : pci_read_config_dword(root, d_off, value));
return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
}
int __must_check amd_smn_read(u16 node, u32 address, u32 *value)
{
- int err = __amd_smn_rw(node, address, value, false);
+ int err = __amd_smn_rw(SMN_INDEX_OFFSET, SMN_DATA_OFFSET, node, address, value, false);
if (PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(*value)) {
err = -ENODEV;
@@ -172,7 +175,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_smn_read);
int __must_check amd_smn_write(u16 node, u32 address, u32 value)
{
- return __amd_smn_rw(node, address, &value, true);
+ return __amd_smn_rw(SMN_INDEX_OFFSET, SMN_DATA_OFFSET, node, address, &value, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_smn_write);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists